On 16 June the Instituto Juan de Mariana received a package sent by the company Termotechnic solar. The recipient, in this case, it was the president of IJM, Gabriel Calzada. In this package were two metal objects, a fuel filter and a metal screw that is adapted to the filter. Both Lorenzo RamÃrez Gabriel Calzada as well as the security officer, made him a sort of vulgar threats. At the time, the very Calzada contacted Pedro Gil, president of the company Termotechnic, whereupon the latter stated that all he had submitted was a report on renewable energy. And is that Gabriel Calzada, doctor of economics, professor at the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, a columnist for Digital Freedom and expansion, and President of the Instituto Juan de Mariana, has become the battering ram, the nemesis, the champion with his sword numbers and figures without heads left environmentalists and advocates of renewable energy wherever it is provided. So, he led an investigation that concluded that every megawatt installed green destroys jobs or 5.3 that each job created green behind the burka of the 570,000 euros in financial need to stand up. Data that ran like wildfire from culebrinas, to the extent that the U.S. Senate demanded his presence to expose the report on the consequences of the English model of renewable energy subsidies. He also participated in programs of CNN and FoxNews after The Economist and The World Street Journal fell on his knees before his studies.
However, more than one would like to see Calzada gone through the grill of the martyrdom of San Lorenzo, as is the case of public or all of these participants in an international conference of the European Commission threatened to not participate if the economist was withdrawn from the program. And climate change is that, in general, and renewable energy, in particular, have become the new golden calf of the West to which must be maintained almost reverential attitude if you dont want to cross the toll that leads to heretics the world of the plague.
All this with the echo of Climategate still bumping into walls or those critical voices to the global warming theory they multiply like lilies in the spring, such as platform 150 scientists who denied these alleged empirical evidence they say prove the existence of anthropogenic warming of the Earth, or more than 700 scientists against the theory UN official accounts of the Environment Committee of the United States Senate. However, in the Spain of Don Quixote and Sancho, the avalanche of renewable energy is sweeping the map any possibility of dissent or scientific debate. By contrast, subsidies and support programs to grow steadily because as a snowball down the mountain, as evidenced by the 6,000 million euros for development green energy and now have to be subdued with the mattress of the electricity bill. It turns out that, sometimes, wanting to do good and run a sort of San Francisco de Asis ends one getting into the shoes of Mephistopheles.
With these cards on the table, it seems even expect all those involved in the renewable energy business resort to all sorts of tricks and wiles of trileros to continue making Americas at taxpayer expense and environmental hoax. And not only include the Termotechnic bravado, but there are those who walk barefoot on the razor's edge risking the type to fill the galleys of gold. As uncover The world just two months ago, solar power plants exist in Andalusia, Canary Islands and Castilla-La Mancha, which have found that between November 2009 and January 2010 were solar energy between midnight and seven o'clock. That is, they got caught with a cart of ice cream. Solar power plants producing at night! The catch? Diesel powered generators. A generator operating at full speed during the night, by magic, planted in the electrical system as clean energy. Thus, there were about 6,000 megawatts pirates who reported 2.6 million euros in bonuses. All this when the solar energy sector does not provide more 2% of the total energy generated in Spain. However, solar industry miscreants under her arm was in 2009 a premium value of 2,300 million euros. The goose that lays golden eggs. What I say chicken, ostrich.
All with solar energy to light the lamp of the established facts, not so clean not nearly as cheap as they preach the officers of the Government and environmental groups. So much so that the process of manufacturing a photovoltaic panel, besides being a very clean process which takes almost as much energy as that generated throughout its life. It is aimed at exploiting an energy that was developed almost exclusively for satellites and extend to the real world even knowing it is ineffective, only be justified from purely ideological views and passion. Keep playing to put your fingers in the socket. Thus, according to rough estimates, is expected to be paid in the order of 19,000 million euros in the coming decades in grants to an energy that has proven highly inefficient. A figure that exceeds the Marshall Plan to heal postwar Europe.
But not everything runs on solar energy. The same fate or worse run on biofuels. Now that in Europe we set out to imitate the Brazilian alcohol movement of the seventies, it's time to put on the scale some of the consequences. The damage that biofuels are causing to agriculture in general began to descry. In the U.S., also in the train of green snobbery is not only obliged to maintain some levels of production of corn for the production of biofuels to the detriment of other food crops, causing a price increase over the second, but also begins to import much of the grain to maintain their minimum biofuel production set by Law Studies at the Cato Institute, for ethanol could compete with gasoline would require almost all the country's arable land, 20% of all State. Also occurs in Europe, where under the auspices of the directive on fuel quality is reduced by overexploitation of certain crops producing surplus material and, under a regime of concessions premium for crop development in the new Member States to increase and meet minimum quotas for production of materials for biofuels. The amnesia, that evil is endemic to the West. Seem to have forgotten the consequences of blocking a process of free market economy and embrace a regulation too broad.
But not everything is there. It happens that biofuels, like other green energy nor are they as clean nor as cheap. In the case of ethanol E-10, less than 25% is renewable, and reduces only 5% of greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, their production, oil consumption is 30% greater than the energy it generates, so it consumes more than it produces. According to Cornell University and California, each gallon of ethanol contains 76,000 BTUs (heat units) produced from 98,000 BTUs. Gasoline, meanwhile, generates 116,000 BTUs, while its production is 22,000 BTUs.
The end, again, seems to be a mile away. The hackneyed nuclear war and oil. Nuclear energy has been shown be cleaner and cheaper. And some oil fields untouchable because of environmental pressure. Alaska is the case, which has given up on a reservation that could explode to 10,000 million barrels of oil and because of environmental laws vented by environmental groups have been denied their exploitation. All this knowing what the consequences of limiting the offer ... If you get into the salad bowl and dressed with other cases such as Venezuela where after taking over Italy's ENI and fire to twenty thousand technicians holdings to grant privileges his countrymen, and which is succeeded by the disasters and fires again decreased the supply of oil exploitation, white and shell. A burden that carries with it the fact that 77% of the world's oil holdings belong to state enterprises, much less efficient and air tight. Sticking It also, according to the National Petroleum Council of the United States, there is enough oil in the world to have to seek any more expensive, and to make matters worse, funded with taxpayer money-the more polluting and less profitable . The big problem is again the lobbyists and anti-energy policies that prevent exploitation of protected sites. And sticks to give the mule ...
In Ancient Egypt extended the mourners, women who were hired to mourn at the funerals of important personalities in order to highlight the importance in life of the deceased. Collected their tears in a glass that was then placed in an urn next to the deceased, besides clothes and start tearing their hair. Others go so far as to scratch their faces bloodied for added drama to the scene. All this in order to get some pennies. Well, it appears that the figure of the mourner begins to play today. Thousands of environmentalists who are tearing their hair out while crying to say protect Mother Earth and, ultimately, end up destabilizing further. Pure pantomime. The money-yes-that moves mountains ...
Coda: official theory? Is not unquestionable? Copy & Paste:
Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize in Physics: "I am skeptical [...] Global warming has become a new religion."
Kiminori Itoh, a former member of the IPCC: the unfounded fear about global warming is the "worst scientific scandal in history [...] When people get to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists. "
Joanne Simpson, the first woman the world to receive a doctorate in meteorology, a former member of NASA, the author of more than 190 studies and recognized as one of the most prominent scientists of the past 100 years: "Since I am not affiliated with any organization nor receive any I can speak frankly funding [...] As a scientist I remain skeptical [...] The statement that the emission of greenhouse gases by humans is the cause of warming is based almost exclusively on climate models. " "We all know the frailty of these models."
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera , researcher at the Institute of Geophysics, University Mexico: "The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC is incorrect because only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity." Geoffrey G.
Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Auckland (New Zealand): "Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide would have minimal impact" on the rise in temperatures compared with the influence of concentration water vapor in the atmosphere. Moonwalker
Jack Schmitt, astronaut honored by NASA, belonging to the Geological Survey Norway and the U.S.: "The global warming panic is being used as a political tool to increase government control over the lives of Americans."
Richard Keen, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at the University of Colorado: "The Earth has cooled since 1998, contrary to expectations by the IPCC."
LeBlanc Smith, former director of the Center for Scientific Research Commonwealthde Australia: "When will society wake up to this collective delusion?".
All this with the echo of Climategate still bumping into walls or those critical voices to the global warming theory they multiply like lilies in the spring, such as platform 150 scientists who denied these alleged empirical evidence they say prove the existence of anthropogenic warming of the Earth, or more than 700 scientists against the theory UN official accounts of the Environment Committee of the United States Senate. However, in the Spain of Don Quixote and Sancho, the avalanche of renewable energy is sweeping the map any possibility of dissent or scientific debate. By contrast, subsidies and support programs to grow steadily because as a snowball down the mountain, as evidenced by the 6,000 million euros for development green energy and now have to be subdued with the mattress of the electricity bill. It turns out that, sometimes, wanting to do good and run a sort of San Francisco de Asis ends one getting into the shoes of Mephistopheles.
With these cards on the table, it seems even expect all those involved in the renewable energy business resort to all sorts of tricks and wiles of trileros to continue making Americas at taxpayer expense and environmental hoax. And not only include the Termotechnic bravado, but there are those who walk barefoot on the razor's edge risking the type to fill the galleys of gold. As uncover The world just two months ago, solar power plants exist in Andalusia, Canary Islands and Castilla-La Mancha, which have found that between November 2009 and January 2010 were solar energy between midnight and seven o'clock. That is, they got caught with a cart of ice cream. Solar power plants producing at night! The catch? Diesel powered generators. A generator operating at full speed during the night, by magic, planted in the electrical system as clean energy. Thus, there were about 6,000 megawatts pirates who reported 2.6 million euros in bonuses. All this when the solar energy sector does not provide more 2% of the total energy generated in Spain. However, solar industry miscreants under her arm was in 2009 a premium value of 2,300 million euros. The goose that lays golden eggs. What I say chicken, ostrich.
All with solar energy to light the lamp of the established facts, not so clean not nearly as cheap as they preach the officers of the Government and environmental groups. So much so that the process of manufacturing a photovoltaic panel, besides being a very clean process which takes almost as much energy as that generated throughout its life. It is aimed at exploiting an energy that was developed almost exclusively for satellites and extend to the real world even knowing it is ineffective, only be justified from purely ideological views and passion. Keep playing to put your fingers in the socket. Thus, according to rough estimates, is expected to be paid in the order of 19,000 million euros in the coming decades in grants to an energy that has proven highly inefficient. A figure that exceeds the Marshall Plan to heal postwar Europe.
But not everything runs on solar energy. The same fate or worse run on biofuels. Now that in Europe we set out to imitate the Brazilian alcohol movement of the seventies, it's time to put on the scale some of the consequences. The damage that biofuels are causing to agriculture in general began to descry. In the U.S., also in the train of green snobbery is not only obliged to maintain some levels of production of corn for the production of biofuels to the detriment of other food crops, causing a price increase over the second, but also begins to import much of the grain to maintain their minimum biofuel production set by Law Studies at the Cato Institute, for ethanol could compete with gasoline would require almost all the country's arable land, 20% of all State. Also occurs in Europe, where under the auspices of the directive on fuel quality is reduced by overexploitation of certain crops producing surplus material and, under a regime of concessions premium for crop development in the new Member States to increase and meet minimum quotas for production of materials for biofuels. The amnesia, that evil is endemic to the West. Seem to have forgotten the consequences of blocking a process of free market economy and embrace a regulation too broad.
But not everything is there. It happens that biofuels, like other green energy nor are they as clean nor as cheap. In the case of ethanol E-10, less than 25% is renewable, and reduces only 5% of greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, their production, oil consumption is 30% greater than the energy it generates, so it consumes more than it produces. According to Cornell University and California, each gallon of ethanol contains 76,000 BTUs (heat units) produced from 98,000 BTUs. Gasoline, meanwhile, generates 116,000 BTUs, while its production is 22,000 BTUs.
The end, again, seems to be a mile away. The hackneyed nuclear war and oil. Nuclear energy has been shown be cleaner and cheaper. And some oil fields untouchable because of environmental pressure. Alaska is the case, which has given up on a reservation that could explode to 10,000 million barrels of oil and because of environmental laws vented by environmental groups have been denied their exploitation. All this knowing what the consequences of limiting the offer ... If you get into the salad bowl and dressed with other cases such as Venezuela where after taking over Italy's ENI and fire to twenty thousand technicians holdings to grant privileges his countrymen, and which is succeeded by the disasters and fires again decreased the supply of oil exploitation, white and shell. A burden that carries with it the fact that 77% of the world's oil holdings belong to state enterprises, much less efficient and air tight. Sticking It also, according to the National Petroleum Council of the United States, there is enough oil in the world to have to seek any more expensive, and to make matters worse, funded with taxpayer money-the more polluting and less profitable . The big problem is again the lobbyists and anti-energy policies that prevent exploitation of protected sites. And sticks to give the mule ...
In Ancient Egypt extended the mourners, women who were hired to mourn at the funerals of important personalities in order to highlight the importance in life of the deceased. Collected their tears in a glass that was then placed in an urn next to the deceased, besides clothes and start tearing their hair. Others go so far as to scratch their faces bloodied for added drama to the scene. All this in order to get some pennies. Well, it appears that the figure of the mourner begins to play today. Thousands of environmentalists who are tearing their hair out while crying to say protect Mother Earth and, ultimately, end up destabilizing further. Pure pantomime. The money-yes-that moves mountains ...
Coda: official theory? Is not unquestionable? Copy & Paste:
Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize in Physics: "I am skeptical [...] Global warming has become a new religion."
Kiminori Itoh, a former member of the IPCC: the unfounded fear about global warming is the "worst scientific scandal in history [...] When people get to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists. "
Joanne Simpson, the first woman the world to receive a doctorate in meteorology, a former member of NASA, the author of more than 190 studies and recognized as one of the most prominent scientists of the past 100 years: "Since I am not affiliated with any organization nor receive any I can speak frankly funding [...] As a scientist I remain skeptical [...] The statement that the emission of greenhouse gases by humans is the cause of warming is based almost exclusively on climate models. " "We all know the frailty of these models."
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera , researcher at the Institute of Geophysics, University Mexico: "The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC is incorrect because only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity." Geoffrey G.
Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Auckland (New Zealand): "Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide would have minimal impact" on the rise in temperatures compared with the influence of concentration water vapor in the atmosphere. Moonwalker
Jack Schmitt, astronaut honored by NASA, belonging to the Geological Survey Norway and the U.S.: "The global warming panic is being used as a political tool to increase government control over the lives of Americans."
Richard Keen, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at the University of Colorado: "The Earth has cooled since 1998, contrary to expectations by the IPCC."
LeBlanc Smith, former director of the Center for Scientific Research Commonwealthde Australia: "When will society wake up to this collective delusion?".
0 comments:
Post a Comment